真相集中营

The Washington Post-As disasters spike superpowers face mounting calls to forge climate deal

September 25, 2023   6 min   1201 words

这篇报道突显了全球气候问题的紧迫性,以及美国和中国在解决这个问题上的重要性。首先,值得注意的是,一些全球气候机构领导人对美国和中国的关系紧张感到担忧,担心这两个超级大国的紧张关系可能会破坏迪拜国际谈判的进展。这种担忧不是没有道理的,因为美中合作被认为是推动国际社会限制全球升温努力的关键。 中国作为世界上最大的二氧化碳排放国,每年排放大约127亿吨,超过美国的两倍。然而,由于美国早期工业化,美国对总体碳排放负有更大的全球责任,这些排放会在大气中滞留几十年。此外,据分析人士称,美国人均排放量也高于中国人,这进一步强调了美中合作的必要性。 文章指出,上周的联合国大会会议汇聚了数百名气候外交官,许多人担心广泛的地缘政治摩擦和融资进展不足会危及COP28。COP28计划于12月在迪拜举行,旨在完成全球“库存评估”,这是对2015年巴黎协定目标的世界进展的正式评估,以及是否需要更强有力的措施来实现这些目标。这次会议的草案版本发现各国远离轨道,时间紧迫,只有美中两国的合作能够带来成功。 然而,美中关系因贸易、技术、人权和俄罗斯入侵乌克兰而仍然紧张。这种紧张关系已经破坏了两国之间的气候谈判,而这曾经是它们关系中的一点亮点。文章还指出,中国最近增加了建设燃煤电厂的活动,这引发了西方国家的愤怒。尽管如此,文章还提到,中国也在更快地采用太阳能和电动汽车,这可能有助于减少其对化石燃料的需求。 总的来说,这篇报道突出了全球气候问题的紧急性以及美国和中国在解决这个问题上的关键作用。然而,由于两国之间的复杂关系和政治考虑,达成合作可能不会轻松。这需要全球领导人在COP28上共同努力,找到新的方法来加速过渡到清洁能源,以实现巴黎协定的目标,这是当务之急。如果美国和中国能够真正合作,将为全球应对气候变化提供重要的动力和示范。

2023-09-22T21:49:55.974Z

A coal-fired power plant in Shanghai in 2021. (Aly Song/Reuters)

Leaders of some of the world’s top climate institutions are ratcheting up pressure on the United States and China to forge an agreement on confronting global warming, fearing that the strained relations of these two superpowers could derail progress at international negotiations in Dubai.

With just two months left before the annual U.N. Climate Change Conference, also known as COP28, leaders from the United Nations, the International Energy Agency and the climate summit itself are pushing for the two superpowers to strike a deal. They see U.S.-China collaboration as key to jump-starting the international community’s lagging effort to limit rising world temperatures, which scientists say are contributing to more deadly fires, floods and storms.

“Such a signal from COP28 would (add) major momentum to our fight against climate change,” IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said in an interview Friday. “I don’t know how likely it is to see an agreement between China and the United States. … But I know that it is very unlikely we reach our climate targets in the absence of that.”

China ranks as the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide, releasing roughly 12.7 billion metric tons each year, more than twice that of the United States. But because of its earlier industrialization, the U.S. bears more global responsibility for total carbon emissions, which linger in the atmosphere for decades. Americans also generate more emissions per person than their Chinese counterparts, according to a number of analysts.

Last week’s U.N. General Assembly meetings brought hundreds of climate diplomats to the United States, many of them fretting that widespread geopolitical friction and a lack of progress on financing are imperiling COP28. Scheduled for December in Dubai, this year’s summit aims to complete the global “stocktake,” a formal assessment of the world’s progress toward the goals of the 2015 Paris agreement and whether stronger measures are needed to meet those targets.

Fatih Birol, Turkish economist and chief of the International Energy Agency, at his Paris headquarters this month. (Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images)

A draft version of the assessment released this month found governments far off track, with “a rapidly narrowing window” for them to catch up. Because the United States and China are the world’s biggest emitters, only major steps forward from the two countries in collaboration can lead to success, Birol and others said this week.

Yet relations between Beijing and Washington remain frosty over trade, technology, human rights and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The tensions have undermined climate talks between the two countries — at one time a rare bright spot in their dealings.

The friction was evident in July when U.S. climate envoy John F. Kerry visited Beijing and Chinese leader Xi Jinping didn’t meet with him. During the visit, Xi delivered a speech saying China’s pace on reducing greenhouse gas emissions “should and must be” determined without outside interference.

In New York on Wednesday, U.N. Secretary General António Guterres convened a summit on climate change without granting either nation a speaking slot. He advertised it as a “no nonsense” summit intended to feature new and ambitious efforts, and he did not hide his frustrations over how industrialized nations are responding.

“Humanity has opened the gates of hell,” Guterres said to open the event. “We must make up time lost to foot-dragging, arm-twisting and the naked greed of entrenched interests raking in billions from fossil fuels.”

Deals between the United States and China have helped galvanize major climate pacts before. Their work ushered in the Paris agreement in 2015, and as recently as two years ago in Glasgow, Scotland, the two nations made a surprise announcement to accelerate their work together on clean energy. Last year, amid broader friction, the best the two countries could do was agree to resume formal negotiations, ending a three-month freeze.

“We need to go beyond that” at COP28, said Adnan Amin, who serves as chief executive of the summit and has been seeking to broker an agreement between the two nations. Amin, who previously headed the International Renewable Energy Agency, spent last week meeting with U.S. officials in New York and was planning to spend this week visiting China.

The most promising opportunities involve technology China could adopt to contain various greenhouse gases, especially methane emissions from agriculture, Amin said.

China’s climate envoy, Xie Zhenhua, said last year that his country would work to reduce methane emissions, but Beijing has not signed a Global Methane Pledge that the United States and other nations have supported.

Amin said the two countries could work together on heavy industry — including steel, cement and aluminum plants, which have emissions that can be difficult to control.

Broader deals, especially to send Chinese clean-energy technology to the United States, are politically unpalatable for President Biden while anti-China sentiment is widespread among both parties in Washington. The Biden administration has accused Beijing of genocide and forced labor in the western Chinese region of Xinjiang and placed a ban on products made there, including solar panels.

Amin said coal is also likely to be a big sticking point. China has infuriated Western officials by increasing its construction of coal-fired power plants again.

It is not running the new plants all out, Amin said China has told his team, leaving them to conclude they may be just a contingency in case the country needs more domestic energy supply. Beijing has made a priority of energy security since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, which sent energy markets into turmoil and led Western countries to target Russia’s lucrative energy export business.

Kerry and Birol wrote an op-ed in The Washington Post last week imploring the world to stop building coal-fired power plants without technology to limit their emissions. The world’s existing coal-burning plants are enough, if left unchecked, to keep the world from fulfilling the Paris agreement, they wrote.

In an interview in New York, Kerry said he wants to get more world leaders to act urgently on emissions, and he expressed frustration over Asia. He said China is responsible for about 350 of 500 gigawatts of new coal-fired power capacity coming online there.

“Those 500 gigawatts could wipe out all the gains of Europe and the United States,” Kerry said. “That’s neither fair, nor is it sensible.”

Birol recently provided a preview of the IEA’s World Energy Outlook report, saying total oil, gas and coal demand will peak this decade, the “beginning of the end” of fossil fuels. While China may be building more coal-fired power than expected, it is also adopting solar power and electric vehicles much faster than expected, reasons to think its fossil fuel demand will also peak, Birol told The Post.

But even that progress cannot reduce emissions enough to limit temperature increases to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the Paris agreement’s goal, Birol said. At COP28, the United States and China must devote “high-level” attention to new ways to further accelerate the transition to cleaner energy, he said.

“Without international collaboration, it will take several decades, and it will (be) much more costly,” he said. “And the nerve center of the international collaboration is whether or not the U.S. and China work together.”